e-mail to GS from CS M.P. Circle regarding vacancy revision

e-mail to GS

To,
Shri Roopchand
General Secretary
All India Association of IPs and ASPs
Qtr.no.12, P&T Coloney, Khursid squre, Civil Lines, delhi 110054

IT IS REQUESTED THAT PLEASE TAKE UP THE MATTER REGARDING RENOTIFICATION OF VACANCIES AS PER Postal Directorate no. A-34012/1/2011-DE dt. 27.05.2011 FOR IP LINE (2+1) & (21+2+2) WHICH IS NOT JUSTIFIED ACCORDING TO YEAR WISE VACANCIES ( i.e.19%+6% of total  Vacant posts)

(1)TOTAL POSTS FOR GROUP B IS 866 DIVIDED IN TO THREE PARTS

(a) FOR PRAMOTION WITHOUT EXAM 75%=649

(b)FOR IP LINE THROUGH EXAM 19%=165

(c)FOR GEN LINE THROUGH EXAM 6%=52

(2) AFTER CREATION OF SR PM /PM CADRE TOTAL 116 POSTS ARE CARVED OUT FROM  EXISTING PSB i.e. 866  HENCE NOW ONLY 866-116=750 POSTS ARE REMAINING FOR GROUP B. OUT OF 750,75%=563 POSTS ARE FOR PROMOTION WITH OUT EXAM FROM IP & 19%=142 FOR IP THROUGH LDCE EXAM, WITH 6%=45 FROM GEN.LINE THROUGH LDCE. HENCE.

(A) THROUGH PROMOTION WITHOUT EXAM 75% OF 750 = 563 FROM IP LINE AND 25% OF 116 = 29 FROM GENERAL LINE POSTMASTER  GRADE-III, TOTAL (563+29=592)

(B) THROUGH LDCE for PSB 25%of 750   i.e.(19% of 750= 142+6% of 750= 45)=187

(C) THROUGH LDCE FOR SR P.M. 75% OF 116 FROM IP LINE=87

 (3)AS I KNOW  LDCE IS CONDUCTED ON THE BASIS OF YEAR WISE VACANCIES WHICH WAS CALCULATED EARLIER BY THE DEPT. LIMITED TO QUOTA PRESCRIBED 19% & 6% AND ACCORDINGLY VACANCIES NOTIFIED FOR LDCE 2011 = 32 FOR IP LINE & 10 FOR GEN. LINE

(A) THE ABOVE EARLIER DECLARED VACANCIES 32 AND 10 SHOWS THAT TOTAL VACANCIES WERE 168 WHICH IS MATHEMETICALY (19% OF168 =32 &6 % OF 168=10) CORRECT

(B) VACANCIES RENOTIFIED AS PER Postal Directorate no. A-34012/1/2011-DE dt. 27.05.2011 IS NOT ACCORDING TO QUOTA 19% & 6% BECAUSE 3 VACANCIES INDICATES THAT TOTAL VACANCIES (i.e. 100%) ARE 15 (19% of 15 =3) AND 25 FOR GENERAL LINE MEANS TOTAL VACANCIES (i.e. 100%) ARE 417 (6% of 417 =25) HOW IS IT POSSIBAL .WE COULDN’T UNDERSTAND

(4) CASE FILED BY PUNJAB CS ON CALCULATION OF VACANCIES IS RESULTED WITH CUTING OF OUR HAND AND FOOTS WHICH WAS ALREADY FOLDED BY DEPTT. AFTER CARVING OUT ALL HSG I (ASP) AND 29 FROM PSS GR-B

(5) I CAN YET NOT UNDERSTAND THAT HOW CS PANJAB SAYS THAT 162 POSTS ARE FILLED THROUGH EXAMINATION OUT OF 165.AS MY LITTLE MIND SAYS IN PREVIOUS EXAMINIATON SELECTED PSB OFFICERS ARE-26 IN 2009 AND 70 ARE IN 2003-2006=70+26=96 ONLY ARE WORKING AS PSB AND OTHERS HAVE BEEN PROMOTED IN GR-A HENCE MORE 165-96=69 POSTS ARE STILL VACANT FOR IP LINE LDCE. 162 WORKING LDCE GR B ARE AVAILABLE AT PRESENT IS NOT POSSIBLE. WHY THE PROMOTED LDCE PSBs ARE NOT SUBTRACTING FROM PRESENT STRENGTH

(6)THE PURPOSE OF LDCE TO FILLUP 25% POSTS THROUGH LDCE ON YEARVISE VACANCIES NOT ONLY TO FILLUP LUMPSUMP 25 % (19+6). IN A YEAR AND NOT OUT OF THE TOTAL VACANCY. ON OUTCOME OF PREVIOUS CAT CASE IN WHICH CAT WAS DIRECTED TO DOP FOR NOT CLUBING THE YEAR WISE VACANCIES.

(7)(A)ON e-MAIL TO GS POSTED BY CS PUNJAB IS CLEARLY MENTIONS THAT "AS THE PSB POST IN GENRAL LINE QUOTA ARE ALLREADY FULL RATHER FOUR OFFICER (27-23) ARE WORKING IN EXCESS THEN HOW 25 POSTS ARE NOTIFIED FOR GEN LINE AND ACCEPTED BY THE CS PUNJAB CIRCLE AS MENTIONED ON POSTS PUBLISHED IN BLOG ON 02.06.2011.

(B).AS PER BLOG’S POSTS ON DTD 02.06.2011 PUBLISHED BY PUNJAB CIRCLE PARA 3.1, 3.2 AND 3.3 ARE CONTRADICTORY TO THE POSTMASTERS RECTT. RULES 2010.

(8) AFTER CONCENTRATING ABOVE FACTS IT IS QUITE CLEAR THAT THE VACANCIES RENOTIFIED FOR PSB ON 27.05.2011 ARE AGAINST THE JUSTICE, AGAINST THE RECTT. RULES (i.e. 1987 AND 2010) AND AGAINST THE CAT DIRECTION ISSUED BY ON LDCE 2003-2006 HELD IN FEB. 2008 AS WELL AS LDCE 2011 HELD ON 29/5/11

(9) SO PLEASE DISCUSS WITH OTHER MEMBERS AND MAKE A REPRESENTATION TO DG (POST) WITH REQUEST THAT DPC FOR PROMOTION SHOULD NOT BE CONDUCTED TILL THE FINALISATION OF THE VACANCIES AND ALSO RESULT OF LDCE CONDUCTED ON 29.05.2011, SHOULD BE HELDUP.